Federico Chang it does not make sense to me about your question can you be more specific

so is this the answer to your question The factor you are describing—that all matter on Earth's surface absorbs heat—is fundamentally how the planet's energy balance works, but it's not the cause of modern climate change [1]. The underlying principle you mention is a constant; every surface has always absorbed energy from the (great) Sun. The critical issue is the change in how that energy is trapped

Here is how 

• Absorption and Emission: Everything on the surface (atoms, land, water, buildings) absorbs incoming solar radiation. If the planet's temperature were stable, it would emit an equal amount of energy back into space as infrared radiation.
• The Problem: The cause of contemporary climate change is the disruption of this balance [1]. Human activities, primarily burning fossil fuels, release vast amounts of greenhouse gases (like carbon dioxide and methane) into the atmosphere [2].
• The Greenhouse Effect: These gases act like a blanket, trapping some of the infrared radiation that would otherwise escape into space [2]. This trapped energy increases the planet's overall temperature, leading to global warming. 

Hope this helps

Helped ,thank you

I know the sun is 109 times larger than the earth, so we need to avoid having too many heat absorbers (to store energy).
）

I said people rely on data, and you have a point. I'm making a bold assumption: if this is the case, with the current population explosion, more fossil fuels can be used in manufacturing. Shouldn't we also consider this factor driving climate change? This isn't impossible, but it's something nobody's discussing.