Hey Wade,

I re-watched that lesson this morning to see if it implied that she was referencing ALL 'Which of the following must be true' question types for mixed setup logic games and I think you might have misunderstood a little bit.

For example, each game will have a different setup based on the rules and limitations, correct?
If we can agree on that we can agree that the rules and deductions she made are actually only true for this game. Since using one game's rules in another game would not work at all, would it? Must be true questions are often quite easy with games like that since there are so many limitations, she already knew that Frank harvested for sure (due to the previous question) and that leaves only one available slot for Leslie because you know she is not harvesting, threshing or milling. 

I thought her logic was pretty sound, but I will re-watch the video and take another look. With logic games I would suggest just drilling yourself to get your setups and deductions right. It is likely the most time consuming aspect of setting up for a game, but then it saves so much time during the questions that ultimately I believe it to be, without a doubt, the most efficient way.

Hey Taylor,

I totally understand that every question will be different, with different parameters, rules, and deductions. My issue with this video is that the "which of the following must be true" question was easily answered using only the deductions already made, which is often not the case. The video thus doesn't address how to approach these questions when the deductions alone aren't enough.

That's a fair assessment.

That sort of question would probably require a quick YouTube search and some note taking. If you haven't looked at Albert's videos from Insight LSAT, I'd recommend those. He is an excellent teacher. 

Khan's program is brand new after all, I'm sure they will expand their video library in due time. Good luck, Wade.

Guys, this one has a factual inaccuracy.  This inaccuracy is proven in the first question in the next video.  I believe the later part of this video should be redone as it's factually incorrect.  The narrator incorrectly deduces that in option #1 F has to come on slot #2.  As one can see in the next video, that is not the case, in fact the answer points to F being in the 4th place.  I was really confused and I had to rewatch that segment a few times as I couldn't understand how that deduction is being made.  Finally, I thought that the narrator made a mistake and I was proven correct in the next video.